<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Urban Planning Blog &#187; Learning</title>
	<atom:link href="http://urbanplanningblog.com/category/learning/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://urbanplanningblog.com</link>
	<description>Thoughts on Urban Planning and Design</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 20:44:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Smart Cities Conferences</title>
		<link>http://urbanplanningblog.com/690/smart-cities-conferences/</link>
		<comments>http://urbanplanningblog.com/690/smart-cities-conferences/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jul 2011 20:26:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pratik</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Learning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conference]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://urbanplanningblog.com/?p=690</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[With two days of jam-packed content, SMART CITIES 2011 will discuss the most pressing issues currently facing our cities – improving public safety, easing congestion, maximising energy efficiency and reducing environmental impact. Bringing together city officials, utilities, transport operators, developers, &#8230; <a href="http://urbanplanningblog.com/690/smart-cities-conferences/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><iframe src="http://player.vimeo.com/video/26906595?title=0&amp;byline=0&amp;portrait=0&amp;color=ffffff" width="500" height="281" frameborder="0"></iframe></p>
<blockquote><p>With two days of jam-packed content, SMART CITIES 2011 will discuss the most pressing issues currently facing our cities – improving public safety, easing congestion, maximising energy efficiency and reducing environmental impact.</p>
<p>Bringing together city officials, utilities, transport operators, developers, investors, contractors and solution providers, SMART CITIES 2011 will show you how to utilise cutting-edge technologies, integrated urban planning approaches and sustainable methodologies to transform urban spaces into better places to live.</p></blockquote>
<p>Anyone attending?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://urbanplanningblog.com/690/smart-cities-conferences/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Solutions for Working Families</title>
		<link>http://urbanplanningblog.com/460/solutions-for-working-families/</link>
		<comments>http://urbanplanningblog.com/460/solutions-for-working-families/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 20:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pratik</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Housing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Learning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Participation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chicago]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[housing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://urbanplanningblog.com/2009/04/20/solutions-for-working-families/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This first-of-its-kind learning conference will help you identify policies that have been successful in other communities and could work in yours. National Housing Conference (NHC) and its research affiliate, the Center for Housing Policy is hosting the &#8220;Solutions for Working &#8230; <a href="http://urbanplanningblog.com/460/solutions-for-working-families/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>This first-of-its-kind learning conference will help you identify policies that have been successful in other communities and could work in yours.</p></blockquote>
<p>National Housing Conference (NHC) and its research affiliate, the Center for Housing Policy is hosting the <a href="http://www.housingpolicy.org/learningconference.html">&#8220;Solutions for Working Families&#8221; Learning Conference</a> from June 28th to 30th.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://urbanplanningblog.com/460/solutions-for-working-families/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Next American City Vanguard Conference</title>
		<link>http://urbanplanningblog.com/453/next-american-city-vanguard-conference/</link>
		<comments>http://urbanplanningblog.com/453/next-american-city-vanguard-conference/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Mar 2009 12:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pratik</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Learning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Urbanscape]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conference]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington DC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://urbanplanningblog.com/2009/03/06/next-american-city-vanguard-conference/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Are you a grassroots activist making a difference in your city? Are you a community leader, providing a voice for your neighbors? Are you heading an organization geared toward making change? We want to meet you! Next American City is &#8230; <a href="http://urbanplanningblog.com/453/next-american-city-vanguard-conference/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Are you a grassroots activist making a difference in your city? Are you a community leader, providing a voice for your neighbors? Are you heading an organization geared toward making change? We want to meet you! <i>Next American City</i> is announcing its first annual conference geared toward bringing together the next generation of urban leaders. From May 20-21, 2009, <i>Next American</i> City will be inviting 30 inspiring individuals from across the country to discuss our role in shaping the future of cities.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://americancity.org/vanguard">More details</a> on Next American City Vanguard Conference. You need to fill out a form to be selected for participation. Be there or be elsewhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://urbanplanningblog.com/453/next-american-city-vanguard-conference/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Offering Financial Incentives to Faculty for Teaching Better</title>
		<link>http://urbanplanningblog.com/441/offering-financial-incentives-to-faculty-for-teaching-better/</link>
		<comments>http://urbanplanningblog.com/441/offering-financial-incentives-to-faculty-for-teaching-better/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 15:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pratik</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Learning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[incentives]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[teaching]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Texas A&M]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[university]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://urbanplanningblog.com/2009/01/15/offering-financial-incentives-to-faculty-for-teaching-better/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My university, Texas A&#38;M has floated an interesting (and controversial) proposal for bettering teaching standards &#8211; by offering a $10,000 bonus to faculty receiving favorable student evaluations. As expected, there is much consternation and the reality on the ground is &#8230; <a href="http://urbanplanningblog.com/441/offering-financial-incentives-to-faculty-for-teaching-better/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My university, Texas A&amp;M has floated an <a href="http://insidehighered.com/news/2009/01/13/bonuspay">interesting (and controversial) proposal for bettering teaching standards</a> &#8211; by offering a $10,000 bonus to faculty receiving favorable student evaluations. As expected, <a href="http://lefarkins.blogspot.com/2009/01/as-you-all-know-first-prize-is-cadillac.html">there is much consternation</a> and the reality on the ground is that only 300 of more than 2,000 faculty members have opted in the &#8216;program&#8217;. <br /><a href="http://yglesias.thinkprogress.org/archives/2009/01/performance_bonuses.php"><br />Matthew Yglesias</a> while understanding that this might not be the best way to better teaching standards, agrees that &#8220;financial payoff to effective instruction might be reasonable&#8221; but we need to measure that &#8220;effective instruction&#8221; in a better manner. Measurement issues in a clearly qualitative environment (quality of teaching) is always going to be an issue that no bonus however high is going to solve. The first question ought to be how much really do you enjoy and want to teach as opposed to doing research. Those who love teaching will always do a good job; $10,000 incentive or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://urbanplanningblog.com/441/offering-financial-incentives-to-faculty-for-teaching-better/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Significant Web Presence through Open Access</title>
		<link>http://urbanplanningblog.com/410/significant-web-presence-through-open-access/</link>
		<comments>http://urbanplanningblog.com/410/significant-web-presence-through-open-access/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 08:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pratik</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Learning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ranking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://urbanplanningblog.com/2008/06/11/significant-web-presence-through-open-access/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Webometrics analyzes about 15,000 universities around the world and ranks 5,000 on their &#8216;web performance&#8217; based on the institutions&#8217; proclivity for a significant web presence. The criteria was determined by a weighted combination of visibility (external inlinks), size (web pages), &#8230; <a href="http://urbanplanningblog.com/410/significant-web-presence-through-open-access/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.webometrics.info/index.html">Webometrics</a> analyzes about 15,000 universities around the world and ranks 5,000 on their &#8216;web performance&#8217; based on the institutions&#8217; proclivity for a significant web presence. The criteria was <a href="http://www.webometrics.info/about_rank.html">determined by a weighted combination</a> of visibility (external inlinks), size (web pages), rich files, and Google Scholar availability [<a href="http://www.deeshaa.org/2008/06/10/ranking-universities-on-web-visibility/">via</a>]. </p>
<p>Their aim is to promote web publication and not rank institutions thus supporting open access initiatives and electronic access to scientific publications for research. Such a &#8216;web presence&#8217; might have a correlation with academic quality and prestige as is evident through the <a href="http://www.webometrics.info/top4000.asp">ranking of top 4000 institutions</a> (I&#8217;m glad to see Texas A&amp;M ranked 16).</p>
<p>On a related note, there is a <a href="http://www.cultureby.com/trilogy/2008/05/jstor-get-out-o.html">call for JSTOR to release academic research material into public domain</a> as the content was created by academics funded by not-for-profit institutions. JSTOR in fact also is a self-sustaining not-for-profit institution.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://urbanplanningblog.com/410/significant-web-presence-through-open-access/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Questia Online Library</title>
		<link>http://urbanplanningblog.com/338/questia-online-library/</link>
		<comments>http://urbanplanningblog.com/338/questia-online-library/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 18:08:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pratik</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Learning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[education]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online tools]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://urbanplanningblog.com/2007/10/08/questia-online-library/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the first things I noticed when I came to the United States for my graduate education was the ubiquity of online resources. The Internet back home in India was still a novelty and its potential for educational resources &#8230; <a href="http://urbanplanningblog.com/338/questia-online-library/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of the first things I noticed when I came to the United States for my graduate education was the ubiquity of online resources. The Internet back home in India was still a novelty and its potential for educational resources was extremely limited.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.questia.com/">Questia Online Library</a> is an example of one such online library that gives you access to a large collection of books and journal articles in the fields of humanities and social sciences. The database also includes magazines and newspaper articles and is searchable by title, author, subject, and keyword.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.questia.com/reg/images/subscribeChoosePlan_questia.gif" align="left" />One of the impressive options in Questia is the availability of online tools that enable users to create footnotes, bibliographical references, and hyperlinking across titles. I cannot overemphasize the importance of such tools that not only recreate the way you would use physical resources but also enhance your experience in using online tools in order to help you maintain a list of resources you accessed. One more additional feature that impressed me was the <a href="http://www.questia.com/publicdomainindex">availability of more than 5000 books in online format</a>. These books are public domain books whose copyright has expired hence are available to read for free in their entirety. No more buying expensive books or looking them up in libraries. You can use all the above mentioned reference tools in these books as well.</p>
<p><span id="more-338"></span>However, the flip side of availing of such resources is the <a href="https://www.questia.com/registration">paid subscription options</a>. But, Questia makes it easy to subscribe and gives you options depending on your use. If you plan on using it regularly for your term papers and research projects, the best option is the annual subscription for nearly $100. If you want to use it for just 1-2 projects, you can choose the relatively less expensive options for a quarterly ($45) or monthly period ($20). Before you buy a subscription, I would advice you to check with your school or university if it has Questia included in its list of available online databases. If not, you can request your institution to add Questia to its list of databases. Finally, I have found references to online resources within Questia in other databases like ERIC (EBSCO) and  Science Direct. I would like Questia to state which journals or books are exclusive to their service which gives me a better idea of deciding if I should subscribe. You can choose to avail of their free trial offer to look around and decide if it is a good match for your research needs.</p>
<p>Personally, I use Google Scholar after logging in through my university&#8217;s proxy server. This allows me to search for articles and books aided by Google&#8217;s superior search technology and the meta-description below every result shows me if the reference is available in my university library in full-text format or otherwise. It also allows me to import bibliographic information into Endnotes (BibTex or Refworks options are also available).<br />
<strong><br />
Note:</strong> This is a paid review for <a href="http://www.questia.com/">Questia Online Library</a>. I request you to check it out and I heartily recommend their service but beware of redundancy if you have access to other similar resources.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://urbanplanningblog.com/338/questia-online-library/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Most Research Findings are False?</title>
		<link>http://urbanplanningblog.com/334/most-research-findings-are-false/</link>
		<comments>http://urbanplanningblog.com/334/most-research-findings-are-false/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2007 16:07:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pratik</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Learning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Research]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://urbanplanningblog.com/2007/09/23/most-research-findings-are-false/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[John Ioannidis at PLoS Medicine writes: There is increasing concern that in modern research, false findings may be the majority or even the vast majority of published research claims. However, this should not be surprising. It can be proven that &#8230; <a href="http://urbanplanningblog.com/334/most-research-findings-are-false/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pubmed&amp;pubmedid=16060722">John Ioannidis at PLoS Medicine</a> writes:</p>
<blockquote><p>There is increasing concern that in modern research, false findings may be the majority or even the vast majority of published research claims. However, this should not be surprising. It can be proven that most claimed research findings are false.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.marginalrevolution.com/marginalrevolution/2005/09/why_most_publis.html">Alex Tabarrok at Marginal Revolution</a> presents the basic idea in a simple-to-understand diagram. But does this conclusion apply to social research or urban planning research as well? There also has been talk of bringing out the &#8216;dark research&#8217; out of the closet i.e. research studies that have yielded results contradictory to the researchers&#8217; expectations and hence aren&#8217;t published. One of their suggestions regarding journal policy that I agree with is &#8211; <em>As an editor or referee, don&#8217;t reject papers that fail to reject the null</em>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://urbanplanningblog.com/334/most-research-findings-are-false/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Analysis of Value</title>
		<link>http://urbanplanningblog.com/305/analysis-of-value/</link>
		<comments>http://urbanplanningblog.com/305/analysis-of-value/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2007 22:54:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pratik</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Asides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fun and Weird]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Learning]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://urbanplanningblog.com/2007/08/27/analysis-of-value/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Since I am currently neck deep in research design studies and formulating my research proposal, I can completely relate to this. Click image to enlarge.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/pcmhatre/1253050892/" title="Photo Sharing"><img src="http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1008/1253050892_69a2f94f72.jpg" alt="analysis of value" height="318" width="500" /></a></p>
<p>Since I am currently neck deep in research design studies and formulating my research proposal, I can completely relate to this. Click image to enlarge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://urbanplanningblog.com/305/analysis-of-value/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Texas A&amp;M ranked No.1?</title>
		<link>http://urbanplanningblog.com/284/texas-am-ranked-no1/</link>
		<comments>http://urbanplanningblog.com/284/texas-am-ranked-no1/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2007 18:52:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pratik</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Learning]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://urbanplanningblog.com/2007/08/22/texas-am-ranked-no1/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[University and college rankings are always disputed regardless of the methodology they employ. The U.S.News and World Report rankings is the most used and oft-cited list although it has been repeatedly rubbished by academicians and professionals. These rankings are often &#8230; <a href="http://urbanplanningblog.com/284/texas-am-ranked-no1/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>University and college rankings are always disputed regardless of the methodology they employ. The <span style="font-style: italic">U.S.News and World Report</span> rankings is the most used and oft-cited list although it has been repeatedly rubbished by academicians and professionals. These rankings are often based on reputation which is a self-feeding circle and endowment size which also like reputation doesn&#8217;t change ranks often. Thus to offer an alternative perspective, <a href="http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/features/2007/0709.ednote.html"><span style="font-style: italic">The Washington Monthly</span> published their own rankings</a> based on &#8220;how much of a contribution does each university make to the country&#8221;.</p>
<p><!--adsense#mediumrect-->The <a href="http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/features/2007/0709.methodology.html">methodology explained here</a> is based on social mobility, research, and service i.e. &#8220;is the school recruiting and graduating low-income students? Is it producing PhDs and cutting-edge research? And is it encouraging in its students an ethic of service?&#8221; The ranking are displayed below and surprisingly puts my current graduate school, Texas A&amp;M right at the top.</p>
<p style="text-align: center"><img src="http://www.washingtonmonthly.com/blogphotos/Blog_College_Guide_2007.gif" /></p>
<p>While I&#8217;m pleased as punch at the top billing given to my university, I must remain skeptical of such rankings. When the magazine lists its criteria as &#8216;contribution to the country&#8217;, are they neglecting the role of universities in the increasingly globalized world? Considering that international students contribute heavily at least to the research conducted in any top university, shouldn&#8217;t that factor in the rankings also? Are the universities necessarily established to keep America competitive in this global economy where human capital is increasingly mobile. You may argue that U.S. universities are clearly oriented toward bettering America&#8217;s standing since most of the research dollars come from federal agencies. However, is this also indicative of the immigration policies of the same government that doesn&#8217;t necessarily encourage immigration? I hope not.</p>
<p>Well, all rankings are subjective to criticism but I will attest to the top quality of research and education at Texas A&amp;M. It is definitely one of the best. Also, I found it strangely funny that a liberal magazine chose a conservative university as its top choice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://urbanplanningblog.com/284/texas-am-ranked-no1/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tate Modern &#8211; Global Cities</title>
		<link>http://urbanplanningblog.com/261/tate-modern-global-cities/</link>
		<comments>http://urbanplanningblog.com/261/tate-modern-global-cities/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Aug 2007 20:48:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Pratik</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Asides]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Changing World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Learning]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://urbanplanningblog.com/2007/08/15/tate-modern-global-cities/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Global Cities looks at the changing faces of ten dynamic international cities: Cairo, Istanbul, Johannesburg, London, Los Angeles, Mexico City, Mumbai, S&#227;o Paulo, Shanghai and Tokyo.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Global Cities looks at <a href="http://www.tate.org.uk/modern/exhibitions/globalcities/default.shtm">the changing faces of ten dynamic international cities</a>: Cairo, Istanbul, Johannesburg, London, Los Angeles, Mexico City, Mumbai, S&atilde;o Paulo, Shanghai and Tokyo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://urbanplanningblog.com/261/tate-modern-global-cities/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

