<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Parametrics in Planning</title>
	<atom:link href="http://urbanplanningblog.com/485/parametrics-in-planning/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://urbanplanningblog.com/485/parametrics-in-planning/</link>
	<description>Thoughts on Urban Planning and Design</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 17:21:00 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://urbanplanningblog.com/485/parametrics-in-planning/#comment-239</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 15:10:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://urbanplanningblog.com/?p=485#comment-239</guid>
		<description>I meant parametric :) but it&#039;s probably telling that I fall back on old terminology.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I meant parametric <img src='http://urbanplanningblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  but it&#8217;s probably telling that I fall back on old terminology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://urbanplanningblog.com/485/parametrics-in-planning/#comment-238</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 15:07:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://urbanplanningblog.com/?p=485#comment-238</guid>
		<description>Planners tend to be a pragmatic bunch. There may well be a use for planametric software within the field of planning, but most of us would like to see some best practices on a demonstrable scale before we start conceiving of entire cities based on a theoretical &quot;planametricism.&quot; Some questions: How can this method help toward meeting triple-bottom line goals? Does it produce designs that non-initiated people like?

That being said, it&#039;s a good thing that there are a certain number of people in the avant garde willing and able to experiment with new ideas, and professionally rewarded for doing so. 9 out of 10 new -isms may fall flat, but we never know if one may eventually work. Seems like a worthwhile investment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Planners tend to be a pragmatic bunch. There may well be a use for planametric software within the field of planning, but most of us would like to see some best practices on a demonstrable scale before we start conceiving of entire cities based on a theoretical &#8220;planametricism.&#8221; Some questions: How can this method help toward meeting triple-bottom line goals? Does it produce designs that non-initiated people like?</p>
<p>That being said, it&#8217;s a good thing that there are a certain number of people in the avant garde willing and able to experiment with new ideas, and professionally rewarded for doing so. 9 out of 10 new -isms may fall flat, but we never know if one may eventually work. Seems like a worthwhile investment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

