<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Indian Megacities</title>
	<atom:link href="http://urbanplanningblog.com/462/indian-megacities/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://urbanplanningblog.com/462/indian-megacities/</link>
	<description>Thoughts on Urban Planning and Design</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Dec 2011 17:21:00 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pratik</title>
		<link>http://urbanplanningblog.com/462/indian-megacities/#comment-224</link>
		<dc:creator>Pratik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 15:09:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://urbanplanningblog.com/2009/05/13/indian-megacities/#comment-224</guid>
		<description>I couldn&#039;t agree more and as this blog&#039;s title suggests, I&#039;m a firm believer in urban planning :) Left to their own accord, cities are rarely efficient and need public infrastructure to streamline activities to enhance quality of life.

Houston has a similar problem to what you described in DC. More ring roads they build, more they encourage sprawl. However, feeder roads parallel to interstates specific to TX lead to more sprawl. But that&#039;s a topic for another post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I couldn&#8217;t agree more and as this blog&#8217;s title suggests, I&#8217;m a firm believer in urban planning <img src='http://urbanplanningblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  Left to their own accord, cities are rarely efficient and need public infrastructure to streamline activities to enhance quality of life.</p>
<p>Houston has a similar problem to what you described in DC. More ring roads they build, more they encourage sprawl. However, feeder roads parallel to interstates specific to TX lead to more sprawl. But that&#8217;s a topic for another post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ckstevenson</title>
		<link>http://urbanplanningblog.com/462/indian-megacities/#comment-223</link>
		<dc:creator>ckstevenson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 03:29:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://urbanplanningblog.com/2009/05/13/indian-megacities/#comment-223</guid>
		<description>I think I see what you are saying, however, but the &quot;unsustainable living conditions&quot; are not feasible UNLESS you are in a city. Those specific maladies (tons of human raw sewage going into a river on a daily basis) can&#039;t be produced in a rural environment.

Cities are only more efficient when the necessary public infrastructure is in place. When it is not (as linked to above) you get serious health and economic issues. People will clearly just go from boom city to boom city, causing massive overpopulation and all that it entails. When it gets too bad, they move on, leaving poisoned and now bubble burst cities laying in their wake.

This is why urban planning is important. Building infrastructure to this year&#039;s needs is horrific. Anyone who has driven the &quot;Beltway&quot; in Washington, DC can attest to this. By the time it was constructed, it was 5 years too small. When they expanded it, again, too small.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think I see what you are saying, however, but the &#8220;unsustainable living conditions&#8221; are not feasible UNLESS you are in a city. Those specific maladies (tons of human raw sewage going into a river on a daily basis) can&#8217;t be produced in a rural environment.</p>
<p>Cities are only more efficient when the necessary public infrastructure is in place. When it is not (as linked to above) you get serious health and economic issues. People will clearly just go from boom city to boom city, causing massive overpopulation and all that it entails. When it gets too bad, they move on, leaving poisoned and now bubble burst cities laying in their wake.</p>
<p>This is why urban planning is important. Building infrastructure to this year&#8217;s needs is horrific. Anyone who has driven the &#8220;Beltway&#8221; in Washington, DC can attest to this. By the time it was constructed, it was 5 years too small. When they expanded it, again, too small.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pratik</title>
		<link>http://urbanplanningblog.com/462/indian-megacities/#comment-222</link>
		<dc:creator>Pratik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 21:09:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://urbanplanningblog.com/2009/05/13/indian-megacities/#comment-222</guid>
		<description>I think Atanu is referring to the fact that in spite of the obvious economic and health issues that mega cities present, they are definitely more efficient. Cities physically do not choke us but rather the unsustainable living conditions of the people compounded by governmental irregularities do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Atanu is referring to the fact that in spite of the obvious economic and health issues that mega cities present, they are definitely more efficient. Cities physically do not choke us but rather the unsustainable living conditions of the people compounded by governmental irregularities do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ckstevenson</title>
		<link>http://urbanplanningblog.com/462/indian-megacities/#comment-221</link>
		<dc:creator>ckstevenson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 19:38:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://urbanplanningblog.com/2009/05/13/indian-megacities/#comment-221</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m confused by your post - Atanu Dey says &quot;Yes&quot; the cities are in fact choking India. You seem to be questioning that. Yes? Cities may be better than the rural alternative, but that doesn&#039;t mean they don&#039;t present economic and health issues on a severe magnitude.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m confused by your post &#8211; Atanu Dey says &#8220;Yes&#8221; the cities are in fact choking India. You seem to be questioning that. Yes? Cities may be better than the rural alternative, but that doesn&#8217;t mean they don&#8217;t present economic and health issues on a severe magnitude.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

